• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • X
  • iTunes
Scott Barry Kaufman

Scott Barry Kaufman

Scott Barry Kaufman - Psychologist, Speaker, and Best-Selling Author

  • About
    • Bio
    • Education Manifesto
    • Sailboat Metaphor
    • Media
  • Books
  • Podcast
  • Research
  • Speaking
  • Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Self-Actualization Tests
    • Coaching
    • Courses
    • Articles
  • Contact

STUDY ALERT: Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation

August 15, 2012 in Study Alerts

Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation 

Jeni L. Burnette, Eric M. VanEpps, Ernest H. O’Boyle, Jeffrey M. Pollack, and Eli J. Finkel 

This review builds on self-control theory (Carver & Scheier, 1998) to develop a theoretical framework for investigating associations of implicit theories with self-regulation. This framework conceptualizes self-regulation in terms of 3 crucial processes: goal setting, goal operating, and goal monitoring. In this meta-analysis, we included articles that reported a quantifiable assessment of implicit theories and at least 1 self-regulatory process or outcome. With a random effects approach used, meta-analytic results (total unique N = 28,217; k = 113) across diverse achievement domains (68% academic) and populations (age range = 5–42; 10 different nationalities; 58% from United States; 44% female) demonstrated that implicit theories predict distinct self-regulatory processes, which, in turn, predict goal achievement. Incremental theories, which, in contrast to entity theories, are characterized by the belief that human attributes are malleable rather than fixed, significantly predicted goal setting (performance goals, r =-.151; learning goals, r = .187), goal operating (helpless-oriented strategies, r =-.238; mastery- oriented strategies, r = .227), and goal monitoring (negative emotions, r =-.233; expectations, r = .157). The effects for goal setting and goal operating were stronger in the presence (vs. absence) of ego threats such as failure feedback. Discussion emphasizes how the present theoretical analysis merges an implicit theory perspective with self-control theory to advance scholarship and unlock major new directions for basic and applied research.

Read article

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Primary Sidebar

Do Nice Guys Really Finish Last?

Vulnerable Minds and the Hope of Resilience w/ Marc Hauser | The Psychology Podcast

What is the Best Psychology Podcast?

What is Self-Actualization Coaching Training?

Top Psychology Podcast Episodes of 2020

Copyright © 2025 · Scott Barry Kaufman