Click here to download the entire intelligence-expertise debate
|
Introduction to the intelligence special issue on the development of expertise: is ability necessary?Douglas K. Detterman |
||||
Target Papers:
|
Experts are born, then made: Combining prospective and retrospective longitudinal data shows that cognitive ability mattersJonathan Wai |
||||
|
Putting practice into perspective: Child prodigies as evidence of innate talentJoanne Ruthsatz, Kyle Ruthsatz, Kimberly Ruthsatz Stephens |
||||
|
The role of intelligence for performance in the prototypical expertise domain of chessRoland H. Grabner |
||||
|
Practice, intelligence, and enjoyment in novice chess players: A prospective study at the earliest stage of a chess careerAnique B.H. de Bruin, Ellen M. Kok, Jimmie Leppink, Gino Camp |
||||
|
Nature, nurture, and expertiseRobert Plomin, Nicholas G. Shakeshaft, Andrew McMillan, Maciej Trzaskowski |
||||
|
Nonsense, common sense, and science of expert performance: Talent and individual differencesPhillip L. Ackerman |
||||
|
Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert?David Z. Hambrick, Frederick L. Oswald, Erik M. Altmann, Elizabeth J. Meinz, Fernand Gobet, Guillermo Campitelli |
||||
|
Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agendaDean Keith Simonton |
|||
Responses:
|
Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticismsK. Anders Ericsson |
||||
|
The Summation Theory as a multivariate approach to exceptional performersJoanne Ruthsatz |
||||
|
What does it mean to be an expert?Jonathan Wai |
||||
|
Accounting for expert performance: The devil is in the detailsDavid Z. Hambrick, Erik M. Altmann, Frederick L. Oswald, Elizabeth J. Meinz, Fernand Gobet, Guillermo Campitelli |
||||
|
Nature, nurture, and expertise: Response to EricssonRobert Plomin, Nicholas G. Shakeshaft, Andrew McMillan, Maciej Trzaskowski |
||||
|
Addressing the recommended research agenda instead of repeating prior argumentsDean Keith Simonton |
|||
|
Facts are stubborn thingsPhillip L. Ackerman |
|||
