• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • X
  • iTunes
Scott Barry Kaufman

Scott Barry Kaufman

Scott Barry Kaufman - Psychologist, Speaker, and Best-Selling Author

  • About
    • Bio
    • Education Manifesto
    • Sailboat Metaphor
    • Media
  • Books
  • Podcast
  • Research
  • Speaking
  • Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Self-Actualization Tests
    • Coaching
    • Courses
    • Articles
  • Contact

STUDY ALERT: On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit

January 15, 2016 in Study Alerts, Blog

bullshit-post

On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit

Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, & Jonathan A. Fugelsang

Although bullshit is common in everyday life and has attracted attention from philosophers, its reception (critical or ingenuous) has not, to our knowledge, been subject to empirical investigation. Here we focus on pseudo-profound bullshit, which consists of seemingly impressive assertions that are presented as true and meaningful but are actually vacuous. We presented participants with bullshit statements consisting of buzzwords randomly organized into statements with syntactic structure but no discernible meaning (e.g., “Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena”). Across multiple studies, the propensity to judge bullshit statements as profound was associated with a variety of conceptually relevant variables (e.g., intuitive cognitive style, supernatural belief). Parallel associations were less evident among profundity judgments for more conventionally profound (e.g., “A wet person does not fear the rain”) or mundane (e.g., “Newborn babies require constant attention”) statements. These results support the idea that some people are more receptive to this type of bullshit and that detecting it is not merely a matter of indiscriminate skepticism but rather a discernment of deceptive vagueness in otherwise impressive sounding claims. Our results also suggest that a bias toward accepting statements as true may be an important component of pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity.

Read article

h/t: Luke Smillie

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Primary Sidebar

Do Nice Guys Really Finish Last?

Vulnerable Minds and the Hope of Resilience w/ Marc Hauser | The Psychology Podcast

What is the Best Psychology Podcast?

What is Self-Actualization Coaching Training?

Top Psychology Podcast Episodes of 2020

Copyright © 2025 · Scott Barry Kaufman

 

Loading Comments...